(0) Obligation:
Clauses:
p(val_i, val_j).
map(.(X, Xs), .(Y, Ys)) :- ','(p(X, Y), map(Xs, Ys)).
map([], []).
Query: map(g,a)
(1) PrologToDTProblemTransformerProof (SOUND transformation)
Built DT problem from termination graph DT10.
(2) Obligation:
Triples:
mapA(.(val_i, X1), .(val_j, X2)) :- mapA(X1, X2).
Clauses:
mapcA(.(val_i, X1), .(val_j, X2)) :- mapcA(X1, X2).
mapcA([], []).
Afs:
mapA(x1, x2) = mapA(x1)
(3) TriplesToPiDPProof (SOUND transformation)
We use the technique of [DT09]. With regard to the inferred argument filtering the predicates were used in the following modes:
mapA_in: (b,f)
Transforming
TRIPLES into the following
Term Rewriting System:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
MAPA_IN_GA(.(val_i, X1), .(val_j, X2)) → U1_GA(X1, X2, mapA_in_ga(X1, X2))
MAPA_IN_GA(.(val_i, X1), .(val_j, X2)) → MAPA_IN_GA(X1, X2)
R is empty.
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
mapA_in_ga(
x1,
x2) =
mapA_in_ga(
x1)
.(
x1,
x2) =
.(
x1,
x2)
val_i =
val_i
val_j =
val_j
MAPA_IN_GA(
x1,
x2) =
MAPA_IN_GA(
x1)
U1_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
U1_GA(
x1,
x3)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
Infinitary Constructor Rewriting Termination of PiDP implies Termination of TRIPLES
(4) Obligation:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
MAPA_IN_GA(.(val_i, X1), .(val_j, X2)) → U1_GA(X1, X2, mapA_in_ga(X1, X2))
MAPA_IN_GA(.(val_i, X1), .(val_j, X2)) → MAPA_IN_GA(X1, X2)
R is empty.
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
mapA_in_ga(
x1,
x2) =
mapA_in_ga(
x1)
.(
x1,
x2) =
.(
x1,
x2)
val_i =
val_i
val_j =
val_j
MAPA_IN_GA(
x1,
x2) =
MAPA_IN_GA(
x1)
U1_GA(
x1,
x2,
x3) =
U1_GA(
x1,
x3)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(5) DependencyGraphProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [LOPSTR] contains 1 SCC with 1 less node.
(6) Obligation:
Pi DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
MAPA_IN_GA(.(val_i, X1), .(val_j, X2)) → MAPA_IN_GA(X1, X2)
R is empty.
The argument filtering Pi contains the following mapping:
.(
x1,
x2) =
.(
x1,
x2)
val_i =
val_i
val_j =
val_j
MAPA_IN_GA(
x1,
x2) =
MAPA_IN_GA(
x1)
We have to consider all (P,R,Pi)-chains
(7) PiDPToQDPProof (SOUND transformation)
Transforming (infinitary) constructor rewriting Pi-DP problem [LOPSTR] into ordinary QDP problem [LPAR04] by application of Pi.
(8) Obligation:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:
MAPA_IN_GA(.(val_i, X1)) → MAPA_IN_GA(X1)
R is empty.
Q is empty.
We have to consider all (P,Q,R)-chains.
(9) QDPSizeChangeProof (EQUIVALENT transformation)
By using the subterm criterion [SUBTERM_CRITERION] together with the size-change analysis [AAECC05] we have proven that there are no infinite chains for this DP problem.
From the DPs we obtained the following set of size-change graphs:
- MAPA_IN_GA(.(val_i, X1)) → MAPA_IN_GA(X1)
The graph contains the following edges 1 > 1
(10) YES